RFC 9736

The BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) Peer Up Message Namespace, March 2025

File formats:

icon for HTML icon for text file icon for v3pdf icon for XML
Also available: XML file for editing
 
Status:
PROPOSED STANDARD
Updates:
RFC 7854, RFC 8671, RFC 9069
Authors:
J. Scudder
P. Lucente
Stream:
IETF
Source:
grow (ops)

Cite this RFC: TXT  |  XML  |   BibTeX

DOI:  https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC9736

Discuss this RFC: Send questions or comments to the mailing list grow@ietf.org

Other actions: Submit Errata  |  Find IPR Disclosures from the IETF  |  View History of RFC 9736


Abstract

RFC 7854, the BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP), uses different message types for different purposes. Most of these are structured as Type, Length, Value (TLV). One message type, the Peer Up message, lacks a set of TLVs defined for its use, instead sharing a namespace with the Initiation message. Experience has shown that this namespace sharing was a mistake, as it hampers the extension of the protocol.

This document updates RFC 7854 by creating an independent namespace for the Peer Up message. It also updates RFCs 8671 and 9069 by moving defined codepoints into the newly introduced registry. Compliant implementations of RFCs 7854, 8671, and 9069 also comply with this specification.


For the definition of Status, see RFC 2026.

For the definition of Stream, see RFC 8729.




Advanced Search