RFC 9601
Propagating Explicit Congestion Notification across IP Tunnel Headers Separated by a Shim, August 2024
- File formats:
- Also available: XML file for editing
- Status:
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Updates:
- RFC 2661, RFC 2784, RFC 3931, RFC 4380, RFC 6040, RFC 7450
- Author:
- B. Briscoe
- Stream:
- IETF
- Source:
- tsvwg (wit)
Cite this RFC: TXT | XML | BibTeX
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC9601
Discuss this RFC: Send questions or comments to the mailing list tsvwg@ietf.org
Other actions: Submit Errata | Find IPR Disclosures from the IETF | View History of RFC 9601
Abstract
RFC 6040 on "Tunnelling of Explicit Congestion Notification" made the rules for propagation of Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) consistent for all forms of IP-in-IP tunnel. This specification updates RFC 6040 to clarify that its scope includes tunnels where two IP headers are separated by at least one shim header that is not sufficient on its own for wide-area packet forwarding. It surveys widely deployed IP tunnelling protocols that use such shim headers and updates the specifications of those that do not mention ECN propagation (including RFCs 2661, 3931, 2784, 4380 and 7450, which specify L2TPv2, L2TPv3, Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE), Teredo, and Automatic Multicast Tunneling (AMT), respectively). This specification also updates RFC 6040 with configuration requirements needed to make any legacy tunnel ingress safe.
For the definition of Status, see RFC 2026.
For the definition of Stream, see RFC 8729.