RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 18 records.

Status: Verified (4)

RFC 8040, "RESTCONF Protocol", January 2017

Source of RFC: netconf (ops)

Errata ID: 5255
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Balazs Lengyel
Date Reported: 2018-02-06
Verifier Name: Benoit Claise
Date Verified: 2018-02-06

Section 3.5.3. says:

If there are multiple key leaf values, the path 
segment is constructed by having the list name, 
followed by the value of each leaf identified 
in the "key" statement, encoded in the order
specified in the YANG "key" statement.  Each key 
leaf value except the last one is followed by 
a comma character.

It should say:

If there are multiple key leaf values, the path 
segment is constructed by having the list name,  
followed by an "=" character, 
followed by the value of each leaf identified 
in the "key" statement, encoded in the order
specified in the YANG "key" statement.  Each key 
leaf value except the last one is followed by 
a comma character.

Notes:

When describing the encoding of key values for a list, in the case of multiple keys the "=" equal sign is not mentioned although it is used in the examples.

Errata ID: 5566
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Martin Björklund
Date Reported: 2018-12-03
Verifier Name: Ignas Bagdonas
Date Verified: 2019-07-09

Section B.3.2 says:

          "player" : {
            "gap" : 0.5
          }

It should say:

          "player" : {
            "gap" : "0.5"
          }

Notes:

The quoted text occurs twice; p 128 and p 130.

The leaf "gap" is defined as type decimal64 in A.1. According to RFC 7951, section 6.1, a decimal64 type is represented as a string in JSON.

Errata ID: 5756
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Kent Watsen
Date Reported: 2019-06-21
Verifier Name: Warren Kumari (Ops AD)
Date Verified: 2019-07-01

Section 8 says:

  module ietf-system {
    leaf system-reset {
      type empty;
    }
  }

It should say:

  module ietf-system {
    leaf system-restart {
      type empty;
    }
  }

Notes:

The section on page 84 discusses the "system-restart" RPC from RFC 7317, but the conceptual example has "system-reset". Fix: s/system-reset/system-restart/.

Errata ID: 5504
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Andy Bierman
Date Reported: 2018-09-22
Verifier Name: Ignas Bagdonas
Date Verified: 2019-04-30

Section B.3.8 says:

      GET /mystreams/NETCONF?start-time=2014-10-25T10%3A02%3A00Z\
         &stop-time=2014-10-25T12%3A31%3A00Z

It should say:

      GET /streams/NETCONF?start-time=2014-10-25T10%3A02%3A00Z\
         &stop-time=2014-10-25T12%3A31%3A00Z

Notes:

The node 'mystreams' is incorrect.

Status: Reported (8)

RFC 8040, "RESTCONF Protocol", January 2017

Source of RFC: netconf (ops)

Errata ID: 6215
Status: Reported
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Kent Watsen
Date Reported: 2020-06-25

Section 4.3 says:

   If a retrieval request for a data resource representing a YANG
   leaf-list or list object identifies more than one instance and XML
   encoding is used in the response, then an error response containing a
   "400 Bad Request" status-line MUST be returned by the server.  The
   error-tag value "invalid-value" is used in this case.  Note that a
   non-configuration list is not required to define any keys.  In this
   case, the retrieval of a single list instance is not possible.

Notes:

This whole paragraph should be removed because, according to Section 3.5 (Data Resource), the "list" and "leaf-leaf" themselves are not a data resources:

A data resource represents a YANG data node that is a descendant node
of a datastore resource. Each YANG-defined data node can be uniquely
targeted by the request-line of an HTTP method. Containers, leafs,
leaf-list entries, list entries, anydata nodes, and anyxml nodes are
data resources.

No GET, PUT, POST, DELETE, or PATCH example in the RFC illustrates an operation on a "list" or "leaf-list" directly (i.e., without a key, which would then represent an element of the list or leaf-list).

Errata ID: 6271
Status: Reported
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Kent Watsen
Date Reported: 2020-09-01

Section 4.5 says:

   The "insert" (Section 4.8.5) and "point" (Section 4.8.6) query
   parameters MUST be supported by the PUT method for data resources.
   These parameters are only allowed if the list or leaf-list is
   "ordered-by user".

It should say:

   The "insert" (Section 4.8.5) and "point" (Section 4.8.6) query
   parameters MUST be supported by the PUT method for data resources.
   These parameters are only allowed if the target resource is a
   non-existent entry of an "ordered-by user" list or leaf-list.

Notes:

First, Section 3.5 (Data Resource) says that "list" and "leaf-leaf" are not a data resources:

A data resource represents a YANG data node that is a descendant node
of a datastore resource. Each YANG-defined data node can be uniquely
targeted by the request-line of an HTTP method. Containers, leafs,
leaf-list entries, list entries, anydata nodes, and anyxml nodes are
data resources.

Second, these query parameters only make sense when targeting a non-existent entry. If the entry does not exist, then PUT is being used like a POST: to create and place an item in an ordered list. However, if the entry exists, then PUT is being used to both replace the contents and (presumably) re-place the order in the list; but this doesn't make sense because:

1) "insert" defaults to "last".
2) there is no "insert" value to indicate "keep existing placement".
3) having to concoct valid "insert" and "point" values is hard.

Thus indiscriminate PUTs would move entries to the end, which can't be desired...

Errata ID: 6277
Status: Reported
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Kent Watsen
Date Reported: 2020-09-03

Section 4.8.5 says:

The default value is "last".

It should say:

The default value is “last”, except when used with PUT 
and the target resource already exists, in which case the 
default is to replace the target resource without altering
its position in the "ordered-by user” list or leaf-list.

Notes:

The "last" default is intended for when creating a new element.

A PUT operation that replaces a list or leaf-list entry should not move the entry unless the "insert" parameter is explicitly passed.

Errata ID: 6342
Status: Reported
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Muly Ilan
Date Reported: 2020-11-22

Section 4.6.1 says:

To replace just the "year" field in the "album" resource (instead of
replacing the entire resource with the PUT method), the client might
send a plain patch as follows:
PATCH /restconf/data/example-jukebox:jukebox/\
library/artist=Foo%20Fighters/album=Wasting%20Light HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com
If-Match: "b8389233a4c"
Content-Type: application/yang-data+xml
<album xmlns="http://example.com/ns/example-jukebox">
<year>2011</year>
</album>

It should say:

To replace just the "year" field in the "album" resource (instead of
replacing the entire resource with the PUT method), the client might
send a plain patch as follows:
PATCH /restconf/data/example-jukebox:jukebox/\
library/artist=Foo%20Fighters/album=Wasting%20Light HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com
If-Match: "b8389233a4c"
Content-Type: application/yang-data+xml
<album xmlns="http://example.com/ns/example-jukebox">
<name>Wasting Light</name>
<year>2011</year>
</album>

Notes:

Missing key leaf value in the message-body (<name>Wasting Light</name>)

Errata ID: 6362
Status: Reported
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Muly Ilan
Date Reported: 2020-12-22

Section 4.3. says:

   The client might request the response header fields for an XML
   representation of a specific "album" resource:

      GET /restconf/data/example-jukebox:jukebox/\
         library/artist=Foo%20Fighters/album=Wasting%20Light HTTP/1.1
      Host: example.com
      Accept: application/yang-data+xml

   The server might respond as follows:

      HTTP/1.1 200 OK
      Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 20:56:30 GMT
      Server: example-server
      Content-Type: application/yang-data+xml
      Cache-Control: no-cache
      ETag: "a74eefc993a2b"
      Last-Modified: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 14:02:14 GMT

It should say:

   The client might request the response header fields for an XML
   representation of a specific "album" resource:

      GET /restconf/data/example-jukebox:jukebox/\
         library/artist=Foo%20Fighters/album=Wasting%20Light HTTP/1.1
      Host: example.com
      Accept: application/yang-data+xml

   The server might respond as follows:

      HTTP/1.1 200 OK
      Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 20:56:30 GMT
      Server: example-server
      Content-Type: application/yang-data+xml
      Cache-Control: no-cache

Notes:

Removed the "ETag" and "Last-Modified" header fields.

According to Appendix B.3.1. :
To retrieve only the configuration child resources, the "content"
parameter is set to "config". Note that the "ETag" and
"Last-Modified" headers are only returned if the "content" parameter
value is "config".

Errata ID: 6363
Status: Reported
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Muly Ilan
Date Reported: 2020-12-22

Section 4.8.2. says:

   By default, the server will include all sub-resources within a
   retrieved resource that have the same resource type as the requested
   resource.  The exception is the datastore resource.  If this resource
   type is retrieved, then by default the datastore and all child data
   resources are returned.

It should say:

   By default, the server SHOULD include all sub-resources within a
   retrieved resource that have the same resource type as the requested
   resource.  The exception is the datastore resource.  If this resource
   type is retrieved, then by default the datastore and all child data
   resources are returned.

Notes:

Substitute "will" by "SHOULD".

Use one of the keywords of RFC2119 to clarify the expected server behavior.

Errata ID: 6473
Status: Reported
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Kyoung-Hwan Yun
Date Reported: 2021-03-10

Section B.3.2 says:

   Example 3: depth=3

   To limit the depth level to the target resource plus two child
   resource layers, the value "3" is used.

      GET /restconf/data/example-jukebox:jukebox?depth=3 HTTP/1.1
      Host: example.com
      Accept: application/yang-data+json

   The server might respond as follows:

      HTTP/1.1 200 OK
      Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 20:56:30 GMT
      Server: example-server
      Cache-Control: no-cache
      Content-Type: application/yang-data+json

      {
        "example-jukebox:jukebox" : {
          "library" : {
            "artist" : {}
          },
          "playlist" : [
            {
              "name" : "Foo-One",
              "description" : "example playlist 1",
              "song" : {}
            }
          ],
          "player" : {
            "gap" : 0.5
          }
        }
      }

It should say:

   Example 3: depth=3

   To limit the depth level to the target resource plus two child
   resource layers, the value "3" is used.

      GET /restconf/data/example-jukebox:jukebox?depth=3 HTTP/1.1
      Host: example.com
      Accept: application/yang-data+json

   The server might respond as follows:

      HTTP/1.1 200 OK
      Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 20:56:30 GMT
      Server: example-server
      Cache-Control: no-cache
      Content-Type: application/yang-data+json

      {
        "example-jukebox:jukebox" : {
          "library" : {
            "artist" : []
          },
          "playlist" : [
            {
              "name" : "Foo-One",
              "description" : "example playlist 1",
              "song" : []
            }
          ],
          "player" : {
            "gap" : 0.5
          }
        }
      }

Notes:

"artist" and "song" are defined as list. Therefore, according to RFC 7951, they should be encoded as array instead of object.

Errata ID: 7311
Status: Reported
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Per Andersson
Date Reported: 2023-01-18

Section 7 says:

              +-------------------------+------------------+
              | error-tag               | status code      |
              +-------------------------+------------------+
(...)
              | unknown-attribute       | 400              |
              |                         |                  |
              | bad-element             | 400              |
(...)

It should say:

              +-------------------------+------------------+
              | error-tag               | status code      |
              +-------------------------+------------------+
(...)
              | unknown-attribute       | 400              |
              |                         |                  |
              | missing-element         | 400              |
              |                         |                  |
              | bad-element             | 400              |
(...)

Notes:

Add missing-element to the table Mapping from <error-tag> to Status Code
in Section 7.

The NETCONF error-tag missing-element is not listed in the table mapping
error-tag to HTTP status code. This seems to be a mistake since all other
error-tags are listed (even the obsolete partial-operation which should not
be used according to RFC 6241).

Status: Held for Document Update (2)

RFC 8040, "RESTCONF Protocol", January 2017

Source of RFC: netconf (ops)

Errata ID: 5493
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Qin Wu
Date Reported: 2018-09-06
Held for Document Update by: Ignas Bagdonas
Date Held: 2019-10-22

Section 6 says:

Note that the YANG definitions within this module do not
represent configuration data of any kind.
The 'restconf-media-type' YANG extension statement
provides a normative syntax for XML and JSON
message-encoding purposes.


It should say:

Note that the YANG definitions within this module do not
represent configuration data of any kind.
The yang-data extension statement
provides a normative syntax for XML and JSON
message-encoding purposes.


Notes:

The 'restconf-media-type' YANG extension has been replaced by more generic yang-data extension.

Errata ID: 5633
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Qin WU
Date Reported: 2019-02-11
Held for Document Update by: Ignas Bagdonas
Date Held: 2019-10-22

Section B.2.2. says:

      PATCH /restconf/data/example-jukebox:jukebox/\
          library/artist=Foo%20Fighters/album=Wasting%20Light/\
          genre HTTP/1.1
      Host: example.com
      If-Unmodified-Since: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 20:56:30 GMT
      Content-Type: application/yang-data+json

      { "example-jukebox:genre" : "example-jukebox:alternative" }

   In this example, the datastore resource has changed since the time
   specified in the "If-Unmodified-Since" header.  The server might
   respond as follows:

      HTTP/1.1 412 Precondition Failed
      Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 20:56:30 GMT
      Server: example-server
      Last-Modified: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 19:41:00 GMT
      ETag: "b34aed893a4c"

It should say:

      PATCH /restconf/data/example-jukebox:jukebox/\
          library/artist=Foo%20Fighters/album=Wasting%20Light/\
          genre HTTP/1.1
      Host: example.com
      If-Unmodified-Since: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 20:56:30 GMT
      Content-Type: application/yang-data+json

      { "example-jukebox:genre" : "example-jukebox:alternative" }

   In this example, the datastore resource has changed since the time
   specified in the "If-Unmodified-Since" header.  The server might
   respond as follows:

      HTTP/1.1 412 Precondition Failed
      Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 20:56:30 GMT
      Server: example-server
      Last-Modified: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 20:57:10 GMT
      ETag: "b34aed893a4c"

Notes:

The date in the Last-Modified field of the response HTTP header should be greater than the date in the If-Unmodified-Since field of the request HTTP header.

Status: Rejected (4)

RFC 8040, "RESTCONF Protocol", January 2017

Source of RFC: netconf (ops)

Errata ID: 5565
Status: Rejected
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Qin Wu
Date Reported: 2018-12-03
Rejected by: Ignas Bagdonas
Date Rejected: 2019-10-23

Section 7 says:

              +-------------------------+------------------+
              | error-tag               | status code      |
              +-------------------------+------------------+
              | in-use                  | 409              |
              | lock-denied             | 409              |
              | resource-denied         | 409              |
              | data-exists             | 409              |
              | data-missing            | 409              |

It should say:

              +-------------------------+------------------+
              | error-tag               | status code      |
              +-------------------------+------------------+
              | in-use                  | 409              |
              | lock-denied             | 409              |
              | resource-denied         | 409              |
              | data-exists             | 409              |
              | data-missing            | 404              |

Notes:

The <error-tag> data missing should be mapped to status code '404' instead of '409' to get consistent with the defintion of data-missing in RFC6241.
--VERIFIER NOTES--
Rejected based on WG discussion: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/XfoOpKslbdbGbX8HZrQHtNRvVkw

Errata ID: 5761
Status: Rejected
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Qin WU
Date Reported: 2019-06-24
Rejected by: Ignas Bagdonas
Date Rejected: 2019-10-17

Section 4.4.1 says:

If the data resource already exists, then the POST request MUST fail
and a "409 Conflict" status-line MUST be returned.  The error-tag
value "resource-denied" is used in this case

It should say:

If the data resource already exists, then the POST request MUST fail
and a "409 Conflict" status-line MUST be returned.  The error-tag 
value "data-exists" is used in this case

Notes:

The error-tag value should be corrected as "data-exists" in this case
based on the context. According to error-tag definition in RFC6241:

error-tag: resource-denied
error-type: transport, rpc, protocol, application
error-severity: error
error-info: none
Description: Request could not be completed because of
insufficient resources.

It is apparent error-tag value "data-exists" should be corresponding
to the data resource already exists condition.
--VERIFIER NOTES--
Rejected based on the discussion on WG mailing list: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/LNYNKiK7RYhTeita4oCte0HVcLA

Errata ID: 5857
Status: Rejected
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Qin WU
Date Reported: 2019-09-11
Rejected by: Ignas Bagdonas
Date Rejected: 2019-10-17

Section 3.1 says:

   The server might respond as follows:

      HTTP/1.1 200 OK
      Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 20:56:30 GMT
      Server: example-server
      Cache-Control: no-cache
      Last-Modified: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 16:00:14 GMT
      Content-Type: application/yang-data+json

      { "operations" : { "example-jukebox:play" : [null] } }

It should say:

   The server might respond as follows:

      HTTP/1.1 200 OK
      Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 20:56:30 GMT
      Server: example-server
      Cache-Control: no-cache
      Last-Modified: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 16:00:14 GMT
      Content-Type: application/yang-data+json

      { "operations" :[ { "example-jukebox:play" : [null] } ]}

Notes:

Returned operations in the RESTCONF response should be an array of the particular type, therefore the brackets are needed to enclose a list of operations associated with example-jukebox.
--VERIFIER NOTES--
Rejected based on mailing list discussion: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/T9y2CxELL4gmvkbBischAUtnYMg

Errata ID: 5858
Status: Rejected
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Qin WU
Date Reported: 2019-09-11
Rejected by: Ignas Bagdonas
Date Rejected: 2019-10-22

Section 5.3.1,5.3.2 says:

      GET /restconf/data/interfaces/interface=eth1
          ?with-defaults=report-all-tagged HTTP/1.1
      Host: example.com
      Accept: application/yang-data+xml

      GET /restconf/data/interfaces/interface=eth1\
          ?with-defaults=report-all-tagged HTTP/1.1
      Host: example.com
      Accept: application/yang-data+json

It should say:

      GET /restconf/data/ietf-interfaces:interfaces/interface=eth1
          ?with-defaults=report-all-tagged HTTP/1.1
      Host: example.com
      Accept: application/yang-data+xml

      GET /restconf/data/ietf-interfaces:interfaces/interface=eth1\
          ?with-defaults=report-all-tagged HTTP/1.1
      Host: example.com
      Accept: application/yang-data+json

Notes:

Based on the rule defined in section 3.5.3 of RFC8040, the module name ietf-interface followed by a colon character (":") should be prepended to the node name interfaces.
--VERIFIER NOTES--
Examples in sections 5.3.1 and 5.3.2 are not based on ietf-intrefaces module.

Report New Errata



Advanced Search