RFC Errata
RFC 8040, "RESTCONF Protocol", January 2017
Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 8527
Source of RFC: netconf (ops)See Also: RFC 8040 w/ inline errata
Errata ID: 7866
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Andy Bierman
Date Reported: 2024-03-23
Verifier Name: Mahesh Jethanandani
Date Verified: 2024-04-03
Section Multiple says:
Text occurs in three places 1) Section 3.5.3 The leaf-list value is specified as a string, using the canonical representation for the YANG data type. Any reserved characters MUST be percent-encoded, according to Sections 2.1 and 2.5 of [RFC3986]. 2) Section 3.5.3 The key value is specified as a string, using the canonical representation for the YANG data type. Any reserved characters MUST be percent-encoded, according to Sections 2.1 and 2.5 of [RFC3986]. 3) Section 5.1 The contents of any query parameter value MUST be encoded according to Section 3.4 of [RFC3986]. Any reserved characters MUST be percent-encoded, according to Sections 2.1 and 2.5 of [RFC3986].
It should say:
1) Section 3.5.3 The leaf-list value is specified as a string, using the canonical representation for the YANG data type. Any reserved characters MUST be percent-encoded, according to Sections 2.1, 2.2, and 2.5 of [RFC3986]. 2) Section 3.5.3 The key value is specified as a string, using the canonical representation for the YANG data type. Any reserved characters MUST be percent-encoded, according to Sections 2.1, 2.2, and 2.5 of [RFC3986]. 3) Section 5.1 The contents of any query parameter value MUST be encoded according to Section 3.4 of [RFC3986]. Any reserved characters MUST be percent-encoded, according to Sections 2.1, 2.2, and 2.5 of [RFC3986].
Notes:
The reserved character list is defined in section 2.2 of RFC 3986