RFC 3973, "Protocol Independent Multicast - Dense Mode (PIM-DM): Protocol Specification (Revised)", January 2005Source of RFC: pim (rtg)
Errata ID: 970
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Mark Doll
Date Reported: 2007-05-16
Rejected by: Adrian Farrel
Date Rejected: 2011-09-04
Remark: In Section 4.7.10 it says, the 4th value is "The Rendezvous Point Tree bit. Set to 0 for PIM-DM. Ignored upon receipt."
It should say:
This Erratum is complaining that this RFC defines a bit, but then marks it as outside the scope of this document.
While this is bad practice, it does not break any rules and is not grounds for an Erratum. It might be justifiable e use of the bit if anyone is interested.
Furthermore, the Erratum does not make any specific point or propose and resolution.