RFC Errata
Found 3 records.
Status: Reported (3)
RFC 4042, "UTF-9 and UTF-18 Efficient Transformation Formats of Unicode", April 2005
Source of RFC: INDEPENDENT
Errata ID: 7868
Status: Reported
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Davide Cavagnino
Date Reported: 2024-03-24
Section 2 says:
and codepoints in the range U+1000 - U+10FFFF (remainder of [UNICODE]) are represented by three nonets.
It should say:
and codepoints in the range U+10000 - U+10FFFF (remainder of [UNICODE]) are represented by three nonets.
Notes:
It seems to me that a 0 is lacking in the definition of a range.
Errata ID: 7869
Status: Reported
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Davide Cavagnino
Date Reported: 2024-03-24
Section 4 says:
the range U+E0000 - U+EFFFF are copied as values 0x30000 - 0x3ffff; that is, these values are shifted by 0x70000.
It should say:
the range U+E0000 - U+EFFFF are copied as values 0x30000 - 0x3ffff; that is, these values are shifted by 0xB0000.
Notes:
It seems to me that the difference between the original and mapped ranges is 0xB0000
Errata ID: 8325
Status: Reported
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Kang-Che Sung
Date Reported: 2025-03-10
Section 5.2 says:
UINT9 *UCS4_to_UTF9 (UINT9 *utf9P,UINT31 ucs4) { if (ucs4 > 0x100) { if (ucs4 > 0x10000) { if (ucs4 > 0x1000000) /* ... */
It should say:
UINT9 *UCS4_to_UTF9 (UINT9 *utf9P,UINT31 ucs4) { if (ucs4 >= 0x100) { if (ucs4 >= 0x10000) { if (ucs4 >= 0x1000000) /* ... */
Notes:
Errors in the conditionals in the C code.