RFC Errata


Errata Search
 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 3 records.

Status: Verified (2)

RFC 3625, "The QCP File Format and Media Types for Speech Data", September 2003

Source of RFC: INDEPENDENT

Errata ID: 249
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Richard Walters
Date Reported: 2005-08-30

Section 3 says: 

    VRAT            = %x76 %x72 %x61 %x74

Notes:

This rule is important because without it, it isn't clear whether the
"vrat" string is capitalized (like "RIFF" and "QLCM") or not (like
"fmt " and "data").

Errata ID: 3383
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Tom Ritter
Date Reported: 2012-10-18
Verifier Name: Nevil Brownlee
Date Verified: 2013-03-16

Section 3 says: 

   rate-map-table  = 8rate-map-entry

It should say:

   rate-map-table  = *rate-map-entry

Notes:

I believe this is a simple typo specifying that there are num-rates number of rate-map-entries

Yes. Something like n-rate-map-entries would be even clearer (* implies a pointer to me)

Status: Held for Document Update (1)

RFC 3625, "The QCP File Format and Media Types for Speech Data", September 2003

Source of RFC: INDEPENDENT

Errata ID: 5135
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Peter Smith
Date Reported: 2017-10-03
Held for Document Update by: Adrian Farrel
Date Held: 2021-06-01

Section 3 says: 

   FMT             = %x66 %x6D %x74 %x20

   LABL            = %x6C %x61 %x62 %x6C

   OFFS            = %x6F %x66 %x66 %x73

   DATA            = %x64 %x61 %x74 %x61

   CNFG            = %x63 %x6E %x66 %x67

   TEXT            = %x74 %x65 %x78 %x74

It should say:

The values for FMT, LABL, OFFS, DATA, CNFG and TEXT all specify
lower-case text values, not upper-case.

Notes:

We can reduce the number of bad implementations by adding a small note mentioning that some of these values are lower case. The values appear at first glance to all be upper-case. A hasty implementer might carelessly use upper case values here instead of the correct lower-case values.

=ISE Note=
The observation is correct (that these six labels use lower case text values and that a careless implementer might miss that fact), but there is no editorial error in the document.
A future revision of this document might add such a note.

Report New Errata



Advanced Search