Found 2 records.

Status: Verified (1)

RFC 1001, "Protocol standard for a NetBIOS service on a TCP/UDP transport: Concepts and methods", March 1987

Errata ID: 5209
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Brian
Date Reported: 2017-12-16
Verifier Name: John Scudder
Date Verified: 2024-01-12

Section 14 says:

FEGHGFCAEOGFHEECEJEPFDCAHEGBGNGF

It should say:

FEGIGFCAEOGFHEECEJEPFDCAGOGBGNGF

Notes:

I notice the same issue that Anvish received. I did not find the corrected answer anywhere after doing a few searches.

Verifier note: this checks out, but doesn’t rise to the level of a technical erratum as defined in https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/processing-errata-ietf-stream/ so I’ve verified it as editorial.

Status: Held for Document Update (1)

RFC 1001, "Protocol standard for a NetBIOS service on a TCP/UDP transport: Concepts and methods", March 1987

Errata ID: 679
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Anvish
Date Reported: 2002-02-25
Held for Document Update by: ron bonica

I found something strange in rfc1001
Maybe my code is wrong, but it returns "Tge NetBIOS tame"
instead of "The NetBIOS name" when I try to encode
FEGHGFCAEOGFHEECEJEPFDCAHEGBGNGF

"For example, the NetBIOS name "The NetBIOS name" in the NetBIOS scope
"SCOPE.ID.COM" would be represented at level one by the ASCII

character string:

FEGHGFCAEOGFHEECEJEPFDCAHEGBGNGF.SCOPE.ID.COM"

It should say:

[not submitted]

Notes:

from pending

Report New Errata