RFC Errata
Found 2 records.
Status: Rejected (2)
RFC 8312, "CUBIC for Fast Long-Distance Networks", February 2018
Note: This RFC has been obsoleted by RFC 9438
Source of RFC: tcpm (wit)
Errata ID: 5907
Status: Rejected
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Elliott Ecton
Date Reported: 2019-11-14
Rejected by: Mirja Kühlewind
Date Rejected: 2020-03-04
Section 5.1 says:
+--------+----------+-----------+------------+-----------+----------+
| Loss | Average | Average | CUBIC | CUBIC | CUBIC |
| Rate P | TCP W | HSTCP W | (C=0.04) | (C=0.4) | (C=4) |
+--------+----------+-----------+------------+-----------+----------+
| 10^-2 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
| 10^-3 | 38 | 38 | 38 | 38 | 59 |
| 10^-4 | 120 | 263 | 120 | 187 | 333 |
| 10^-5 | 379 | 1795 | 593 | 1054 | 1874 |
| 10^-6 | 1200 | 12279 | 3332 | 5926 | 10538 |
| 10^-7 | 3795 | 83981 | 18740 | 33325 | 59261 |
| 10^-8 | 12000 | 574356 | 105383 | 187400 | 333250 |
+--------+----------+-----------+------------+-----------+----------+
Table 1
It should say:
+--------+----------+-----------+------------+-----------+----------+
| Loss | Average | Average | CUBIC | CUBIC | CUBIC |
| Rate P | TCP W | HSTCP W | (C=0.04) | (C=0.4) | (C=4) |
+--------+----------+-----------+------------+-----------+----------+
| 10^-2 | 12 | 12 | 3 | 6 | 11 |
| 10^-3 | 38 | 38 | 19 | 33 | 59 |
| 10^-4 | 120 | 263 | 120 | 187 | 333 |
| 10^-5 | 379 | 1795 | 593 | 1054 | 1874 |
| 10^-6 | 1200 | 12279 | 3332 | 5926 | 10538 |
| 10^-7 | 3795 | 83981 | 18740 | 33325 | 59261 |
| 10^-8 | 12000 | 574356 | 105383 | 187400 | 333250 |
+--------+----------+-----------+------------+-----------+----------+
Table 1
Notes:
The CUBIC average window sizes for 10^2 and 10^3 are incorrect in the original text using expression 6.
--VERIFIER NOTES--
See Section 4.2. on how Cubic calculates the congestion window in TCP-Friendly Region.
Errata ID: 5909
Status: Rejected
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Elliott Ecton
Date Reported: 2019-11-14
Rejected by: Mirja Kühlewind
Date Rejected: 2020-03-04
Section 5.1 says:
+--------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+---------+
| Loss | Average | Average | CUBIC | CUBIC | CUBIC |
| Rate P | TCP W | HSTCP W | (C=0.04) | (C=0.4) | (C=4) |
+--------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+---------+
| 10^-2 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
| 10^-3 | 38 | 38 | 38 | 38 | 38 |
| 10^-4 | 120 | 263 | 120 | 120 | 120 |
| 10^-5 | 379 | 1795 | 379 | 379 | 379 |
| 10^-6 | 1200 | 12279 | 1200 | 1200 | 1874 |
| 10^-7 | 3795 | 83981 | 3795 | 5926 | 10538 |
| 10^-8 | 12000 | 574356 | 18740 | 33325 | 59261 |
+--------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+---------+
Table 2
It should say:
+--------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+---------+
| Loss | Average | Average | CUBIC | CUBIC | CUBIC |
| Rate P | TCP W | HSTCP W | (C=0.04) | (C=0.4) | (C=4) |
+--------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+---------+
| 10^-2 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 10^-3 | 38 | 38 | 3 | 6 | 11 |
| 10^-4 | 120 | 263 | 19 | 33 | 59 |
| 10^-5 | 379 | 1795 | 105 | 187 | 333 |
| 10^-6 | 1200 | 12279 | 593 | 1054 | 1874 |
| 10^-7 | 3795 | 83981 | 3332 | 5926 | 10538 |
| 10^-8 | 12000 | 574356 | 18740 | 33325 | 59261 |
+--------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+---------+
Table 2
Notes:
The average window size for the CUBIC columns were mostly incorrect in table 2. Corrected them using expression 6
--VERIFIER NOTES--
See Section 4.2. on how Cubic calculates the congestion window in TCP-Friendly Region.