RFC Errata
Found 2 records.
Status: Verified (1)
RFC 826, "An Ethernet Address Resolution Protocol: Or Converting Network Protocol Addresses to 48.bit Ethernet Address for Transmission on Ethernet Hardware", November 1982
Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 5227, RFC 5494
Source of RFC: Legacy
Errata ID: 7909
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alexander Bondarenko
Date Reported: 2024-04-26
Verifier Name: Eric Vyncke
Date Verified: 2024-04-26
The "Packet format" section says:
16.bit: (ar$pro) Protocol address space. For Ethernet hardware, this is from the set of type fields ether_typ$<protocol>.
It should say:
16.bit: (ar$pro) Protocol address space. For Ethernet hardware, this is from the set of type fields ether_type$<protocol>.
Notes:
In original text last letter "e" is missing in "ether_type$<protocol>".
--- Verifier note (Eric Vyncke, INT AD) ---
After reclassification into "editorial", this erratum is approved.
Status: Rejected (1)
RFC 826, "An Ethernet Address Resolution Protocol: Or Converting Network Protocol Addresses to 48.bit Ethernet Address for Transmission on Ethernet Hardware", November 1982
Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 5227, RFC 5494
Source of RFC: Legacy
Errata ID: 7630
Status: Rejected
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: enea eugen
Date Reported: 2023-09-05
Rejected by: John Scudder
Date Rejected: 2024-01-12
Section The Problem: says:
The world is a jungle in general, and the networking game contributes many animals.
It should say:
The world is a jungle in general, and in the networking game contribute many animals.
Notes:
The original text makes no sense.
--VERIFIER NOTES--
While the original text is somewhat idiomatic, it makes perfect sense. The proposed rewrite, on the other hand, doesn't.