RFC Errata
RFC 4851, "The Flexible Authentication via Secure Tunneling Extensible Authentication Protocol Method (EAP-FAST)", May 2007
Source of RFC: IETF - NON WORKING GROUPSee Also: RFC 4851 w/ inline errata
Errata ID: 952
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2007-05-12
Verifier Name: RFC Editor
Date Verified: 2007-11-02
Section 3.2.1 -- terminological mismatch
Only in this section, the RFC uses the spelling "SessionID" (4 x);
throughout the remainder of the text, "Session ID" is used.
Section 3.2.3 -- typo
In the 3rd text line of Section 3.2.3, on page 12,
the RFC test:
... contains a empty Session ID
should say:
... contains an empty Session ID
^
Section 3.3.1 -- typo
In the second line of the last paragraph of Section 3.3.1,
on page 13, the RFC text:
... If either indicates failure. then the method is
should say:
... If either indicates failure, then the method is
^
Section 3.7 -- typo
In the first line of the second paragraph of Section 3.7,
the RFC text:
Since EAP is an lock-step protocol, [...]
^
should say:
Since EAP is a lock-step protocol, [...]
Section 5.5 -- typo
In the third line of Section 5.5 (on page 35), as in many other
places in the RFC, the initial
Where
should be
where
Section 6 -- inconsistent use of established terms
The RFC 2434 requirements terms are spelled inconsistently.
For uniformity, at the bottom of page 36,
... based on specifications required ...
^ ^ ^
should be:
... based on Specification Required ...
and in the fourth line on page 37,
... on a specification required basis ...
^ ^
should be:
... on a Specification Required basis ...
Section 7.4.1 -- typos
there are two typos in the last part of the first paragraph
of Section 7.4.1; the lines on top of page 40,
vvv
| is unauthenticated an may not have any relevance to the authenticated
identity. EAP-FAST implementations should not attempt to compare any
identity disclosed in the initial cleartext EAP Identity response
| packet with those Identities authenticated in Phase 2
^
should say:
v
| is unauthenticated and may not have any relevance to the authenticated
identity. EAP-FAST implementations should not attempt to compare any
identity disclosed in the initial cleartext EAP Identity response
| packet with those Identities authenticated in Phase 2.
It should say:
[see above]
Notes:
editorial nits.
from pending.
