RFC 4873, "GMPLS Segment Recovery", May 2007

Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 9270

Errata ID: 945
Status: Rejected
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2007-05-08
Rejected by: Adrian Farrel
Date Rejected: 2010-10-30

Section 7 says:

   This section presents the RSVP message related formats as modified by
   this document.  Where they differ, formats for unidirectional LSPs
   are presented separately from bidirectional LSPs.

It should say:

   This section presents the RSVP-TE message related formats as modified
   by this document.  Where they differ, formats for unidirectional LSPs
   are presented separately from bidirectional LSPs.

Notes:

Does not confine the scope of the specification as it
would be appropriate.

'Classic' RSVP (RFC 2205) is neither covered nor affected by the
subsequently specified (extended) message formats.

from pending
--VERIFIER NOTES--
Although it is true that there is some common distinction between "classic" RSVP and RSVP-TE, the IP protocol number is the same, and the message numbers (and registry) are the same. In essence, there is just one protocol with two uses.

Report New Errata