RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

RFC 4873, "GMPLS Segment Recovery", May 2007

Source of RFC: ccamp (rtg)

Errata ID: 941
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2007-05-08
Held for Document Update by: Adrian Farrel
Date Held: 2010-10-30

Section 5.1 says:

   The format of a SECONDARY_RECORD_ROUTE object is the same as a
   RECORD_ROUTE object, Class number 21.  This includes the definition
   of subobjects defined for RECORD_ROUTE object.  The class of the
   SECONDARY_RECORD_ROUTE object is 201 (of the form 11bbbbbb).

It should say:

   The format of a SECONDARY_RECORD_ROUTE object is the same as that of
   a RECORD_ROUTE object, Class number 21.  This includes the definition
   of subobjects defined for the RECORD_ROUTE object.  The class of the
   SECONDARY_RECORD_ROUTE object is 201 (of the form 11bbbbbb).

Notes:

The proposed text change (below) is rejected in favor of more correct English.
The format of a SECONDARY_RECORD_ROUTE object is the same as for a
RECORD_ROUTE object, Class number 21. This includes the definition
of subobjects defined for the RECORD_ROUTE object. The class of the
SECONDARY_RECORD_ROUTE object is 201 (of the form 11bbbbbb).

Report New Errata