RFC Errata
RFC 4873, "GMPLS Segment Recovery", May 2007
Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 9270
Source of RFC: ccamp (rtg)
Errata ID: 935
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2007-05-08
Held for Document Update by: Adrian Farrel
Section 2 Near the end of the second-to-last paragraph on page 5, RFC 4873 says: [...]. The branch node of a recovery LSP creates an SRRO by copying the RRO from | the Resv message of associated recovery LSP into a new SRRO object. Any SRROs present in the recovery LSP's Resv message are also copied. It should say: [...]. The branch node of a recovery LSP creates an SRRO by copying the RRO from | the Resv message of the associated recovery LSP into a new SRRO object. Any SRROs present in the recovery LSP's Resv message are also copied. Rationale: missing article. Section 3.2 On page 7, the last sentence of Section 3.2 says: | [...]. This object MUST NOT be used when association is made according to the methods defined in [RFC4090]. It should say: | [...]. This object MUST NOT be used when an association is made according to the methods defined in [RFC4090]. Rationale: missing article. Section 4.1 On page 8, Section 4.1 says: [...]. This includes the definition of subobjects | defined for EXPLICIT_ROUTE object. The class of the SECONDARY_EXPLICIT_ROUTE object is 200 (of the form 11bbbbbb). It should say: [...]. This includes the definition of subobjects | defined for the EXPLICIT_ROUTE object. The class of the SECONDARY_EXPLICIT_ROUTE object is 200 (of the form 11bbbbbb). Rationale: missing article. Section 4.2 In the second paragraph on page 10, Section 4.2 says: | At a branch node, the SERO, together with the Path message of LSP being recovered, provides the information to create the recovery LSP. [...] It should say: | At a branch node, the SERO, together with the Path message of the LSP being recovered, provides the information to create the recovery LSP. [...] Rationale: missing article. Section 4.2.1 Near the bottom of page 10, the first paragraph of Section 4.2.1 says: [...]. The | processing of these events depend on a number of factors. It should say: [...]. The | processing of these events depends on a number of factors. ^ Rationale: grammar. Section 4.3.2 The second sentence of Section 4.3.2 says: | [...]. When a branch or merge node receives notification of an LSP failure and it is unable to recover from that failure, [...] It should say: | [...]. When a branch or merge node receives a notification of an LSP failure and it is unable to recover from that failure, [...] Rationale: missing article. Section 6.2 The last sentence of the third paragraph of Section 6.2, on mid-page 17, says: [...]. The dynamically identified information, together with the Path message of | LSP being recovered, is used to create the recovery LSP. It should say: [...]. The dynamically identified information, together with the Path message of | the LSP being recovered, is used to create the recovery LSP. Rationale: missing article.
It should say:
[see above]
Notes:
editorial nits.
from pending