RFC Errata
RFC 9359, "Echo Request/Reply for Enabled In Situ OAM (IOAM) Capabilities", April 2023
Source of RFC: ippm (ops)See Also: RFC 9359 w/ inline errata
Errata ID: 7901
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT, PDF, HTML
Reported By: Loa Andersson
Date Reported: 2024-04-19
Verifier Name: Mohamed Boucadair
Date Verified: 2025-03-28
Throughout the document, when it says:
Echo Request/Reply for Enabled In Situ OAM (IOAM) Capabilities
It should say:
Echo Request/Reply for Enabled In Situ Operation, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) Capabilities
Notes:
Neither OAM nor IOAM are well-known and need to be expanded at first use, this is the title so this is the first occurrence.
== Verifier note
The change is also consistent with the use in RFC 9486, RFC 9378, RFC 9322, RFC 9326, RFC 9197, etc.
