RFC Errata
RFC 9522, "Overview and Principles of Internet Traffic Engineering", January 2024
Source of RFC: teas (rtg)See Also: RFC 9522 w/ inline errata
Errata ID: 7815
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Nikolai Malykh
Date Reported: 2024-02-20
Verifier Name: RFC Editor
Date Verified: 2024-02-20
Section 5.1.3.7 says:
IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) [RFC5470] defines an architecture that is very similar to the RTFM architecture and includes Metering, Exporting, and Collecting Processes. [RFC5472] describes the applicability of IPFIX and makes a comparison with RTFM, pointing out that, architecturally, while RTM talks about devices, IPFIX deals with processes to clarify that multiple of those processes may be co- located on the same machine. The IPFIX protocol [RFC7011] is widely implemented.
It should say:
IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) [RFC5470] defines an architecture that is very similar to the RTFM architecture and includes Metering, Exporting, and Collecting Processes. [RFC5472] describes the applicability of IPFIX and makes a comparison with RTFM, pointing out that, architecturally, while RTFM talks about devices, IPFIX deals with processes to clarify that multiple of those processes may be co- located on the same machine. The IPFIX protocol [RFC7011] is widely implemented.
Notes:
Missing a letter in the acronym RTFM.
RTM > RTFM