RFC Errata
RFC 4561, "Definition of a Record Route Object (RRO) Node-Id Sub-Object", June 2006
Source of RFC: mpls (rtg)See Also: RFC 4561 w/ inline errata
Errata ID: 7583
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Igor Malyushkin
Date Reported: 2023-08-01
Verifier Name: Andrew Alston
Date Verified: 2023-11-12
Section 3 says:
[RSVP-TE] defines the IPv4 and IPv6 RRO sub-objects. Moreover, two additional flags are defined in [FAST-REROUTE]: the "Local Protection Available" and "Local Protection in Use" bits.
It should say:
[RSVP-TE] defines the IPv4 and IPv6 RRO sub-objects. Moreover, two additional flags are defined in [FAST-REROUTE]: the "Bandwidth protection" and "Node protection" bits.
Notes:
The "Local Protection Available" and "Local Protection in Use" are defined in RFC3209 (Sections 4.4.1.1, 4.4.1.2), not RFC4090. The latter defines "Bandwidth protection" and "Node protection" in Section 4.4.