RFC 2696, "LDAP Control Extension for Simple Paged Results Manipulation", September 1999

Errata ID: 7292
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Yogender Bhabhoria
Date Reported: 2022-12-28
Verifier Name: RFC Editor
Date Verified: 2023-01-06

Section 4. Example says:

C: SearchRequest + pagedResultsControl(3,"")
   -- Server responds with three entries plus an indication
   -- of 5 total entries in the search result and an opaque
   -- cooking to be used by the client when retrieving subsequent
   -- pages.
   S: SearchResultEntry
   S: SearchResultEntry
   S: SearchResultEntry
   S: SearchResultDone + pagedResultsControl(5, "opaque")
   -- Client sends an identical search request (except for
   -- message id), returning the opaque cooking, asking for
   -- the next page.

It should say:

C: SearchRequest + pagedResultsControl(3,"")
   -- Server responds with three entries plus an indication
   -- of 5 total entries in the search result and an opaque
   -- cookie to be used by the client when retrieving subsequent
   -- pages.
   S: SearchResultEntry
   S: SearchResultEntry
   S: SearchResultEntry
   S: SearchResultDone + pagedResultsControl(5, "opaque")
   -- Client sends an identical search request (except for
   -- message id), returning the opaque cookie, asking for
   -- the next page.

Notes:

It's a cookie that's received/sent. Instead of cookie, the RFC says cooking in two places.

Report New Errata