RFC Errata
RFC 8994, "An Autonomic Control Plane (ACP)", May 2021
Source of RFC: anima (ops)See Also: RFC 8994 w/ inline errata
Errata ID: 7071
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT, PDF, HTML
Reported By: Corey Bonnell
Date Reported: 2022-08-04
Verifier Name: Rob Wilton
Date Verified: 2024-01-15
Section 6.2.2 says:
The acp-node-name in Figure 2 is the ABNF definition ("Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF" [RFC5234]) of the ACP Node Name. An ACP certificate MUST carry this information. It MUST contain an otherName field in the X.509 Subject Alternative Name extension, and the otherName MUST contain an AcpNodeName as described in Section 6.2.2.
It should say:
The acp-node-name in Figure 2 is the ABNF definition ("Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF" [RFC5234]) of the ACP Node Name. An ACP certificate MUST carry this information. It MUST contain an otherName field in the X.509 Subject Alternative Name extension, and the otherName MUST contain an AcpNodeName as described in Section 6.2.2.1.
Notes:
David von Oheimb discovered [1] that section 6.2.2 is self-referential and incorrect regarding the section reference to the ASN.1 module.
The correct section number is 6.2.2.1.
[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/-ymZk94KFzzolZSsJh6HONnypXQ/