RFC Errata
RFC 5322, "Internet Message Format", October 2008
Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 6854
Source of RFC: IETF - NON WORKING GROUPArea Assignment: app
See Also: RFC 5322 w/ inline errata
Errata ID: 6920
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: John Klensin
Date Reported: 2022-04-05
Verifier Name: Orie Steele
Date Verified: 2024-04-01
Section 2.1 says:
and interpreted as US-ASCII [ANSI.X3-4.1986] characters. For brevity, this document sometimes refers to this range of characters as simply "US-ASCII characters".
It should say:
and interpreted as ASCII [ANSI.X3-4.1986] characters. For brevity, this document sometimes refers to this range of characters as simply "ASCII characters".
Notes:
The choice of "US-ASCII" as a charset name reflected circumstances at the time, but it was not then and has never been the name of a coded character set, much less the one specified in the various versions of what is now ANSI INCITS 4-1986[R2017]. The common name of the latter, both specified in the Standard and in common practice, is "ASCII" without any further qualification. "For brevity", "ASCII" is not only more accurate, but shorter. While the correction is being made, it would be wise to change the citation anchor to "[ASCII]" or, if necessary for some reason, "[ASCII1986]". The odd punctuation used in "[ANSI.X3-4.1986]" to refer to ANSI X3.4-1986 is just unnecessarily confusing.
(this erratum is being reported more or less at the request of the editor of RFC 5322 and its successor)