RFC Errata
RFC 2026, "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision 3", October 1996
Source of RFC: poised95 (gen)
Errata ID: 6671
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Jason Yundt
Date Reported: 2021-08-31
Held for Document Update by: Lars Eggert
Date Held: 2023-08-11
Section 13 says:
[1] Postel, J., "Internet Official Protocol Standards", STD 1, USC/Information Sciences Institute, March 1996. [2] ANSI, Coded Character Set -- 7-Bit American Standard Code for Information Interchange, ANSI X3.4-1986. [3] Reynolds, J., and J. Postel, "Assigned Numbers", STD 2, USC/Information Sciences Institute, October 1994. [4] Postel, J., "Introduction to the STD Notes", RFC 1311, USC/Information Sciences Institute, March 1992. [5] Postel, J., "Instructions to RFC Authors", RFC 1543, USC/Information Sciences Institute, October 1993. [6] Huitema, C., J. Postel, and S. Crocker "Not All RFCs are Standards", RFC 1796, April 1995.
It should say:
[1] Postel, J., "Internet Official Protocol Standards", STD 1, USC/Information Sciences Institute, March 1996. [2] ANSI, Coded Character Set -- 7-Bit American Standard Code for Information Interchange, ANSI X3.4-1986. [3] Postel, J., "Introduction to the STD Notes", RFC 1311, USC/Information Sciences Institute, March 1992. [4] Postel, J., "Instructions to RFC Authors", RFC 1543, USC/Information Sciences Institute, October 1993. [5] Huitema, C., J. Postel, and S. Crocker "Not All RFCs are Standards", RFC 1796, April 1995.
Notes:
Reference number 3 is never used. If this change is made, then the inline citations will also have to be updated.