RFC 6376, "DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures", September 2011

Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 8301, RFC 8463, RFC 8553, RFC 8616

Errata ID: 6254
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Dave Crocker
Date Reported: 2020-08-08
Held for Document Update by: Murray Kucherawy
Date Held: 2021-12-02

Section 5.4 says:

Notes:

The "INFORMATIVE OPERATIONS NOTE" early in Section 5.4 appears to be in conflict with Section 5.4.1. They appear to cover the same issue, namely what header fields to use for the signature, but they seem to give different advice. (Though not formally an erratum, there is also the matter of thinking that what is shown the the recipient is relevant...) /d

Report New Errata