RFC Errata
RFC 7868, "Cisco's Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (EIGRP)", May 2016
Source of RFC: INDEPENDENT
Errata ID: 6084
Status: Reported
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Rafał Cygnarowski
Date Reported: 2020-04-10
Section 5.6.2.3. says:
The formula for the conversion for Max-Throughput value directly from the interface without consideration of congestion-based effects is as follows: (EIGRP_BANDWIDTH * EIGRP_WIDE_SCALE) Max-Throughput = K1 * ------------------------------------ Interface Bandwidth (kbps) If K2 is used, the effect of congestion as a measure of load reported by the interface will be used to simulate the "available Throughput" by adjusting the maximum Throughput according to the formula: K2 * Max-Throughput Net-Throughput = Max-Throughput + --------------------- 256 - Load
It should say:
The formula for the conversion for Max-Throughput value directly from the interface without consideration of congestion-based effects is as follows: EIGRP_BANDWIDTH * EIGRP_WIDE_SCALE Max-Throughput = ------------------------------------ Interface Bandwidth (kbps) If K2 is used, the effect of congestion as a measure of load reported by the interface will be used to simulate the "available Throughput" by adjusting the maximum Throughput according to the formula: K2 * Max-Throughput Net-Throughput = K1 * Max-Throughput + --------------------- 256 - Load
Notes:
K1 can't be a part of Max-Throughput as it affects Net-Throughput twice. Moreover: in case of K1=0, K2 become ignored as it will be multiplied by 0.
Together with errata ID: 5242 which fixes metric formula {metric =[Net-Throughput+Latency+(K6*ExtAttr)] * K5/(K4+Rel) }, results become correct and are same as on live equipment.