RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

RFC 7233, "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Range Requests", June 2014

Note: This RFC has been obsoleted by RFC 9110

Source of RFC: httpbis (wit)

Errata ID: 4682
Status: Rejected
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Kannan Goundan
Date Reported: 2016-05-03
Rejected by: Alexey Melnikov
Date Rejected: 2017-02-23

Section 2.1 says:

byte-range-set= 1#( byte-range-spec / suffix-byte-range-spec )

It should say:

According to the "1#element" rule, the expansion would be:

    byte-range-set = ( byte-range-spec /
        suffix-byte-range-spec ) *( OWS "," OWS ( byte-range-spec /
        suffix-byte-range-spec ) )

But Appendix D has the definition:

    byte-range-set = *( "," OWS ) ( byte-range-spec /
        suffix-byte-range-spec ) *( OWS "," [ OWS ( byte-range-spec /
        suffix-byte-range-spec ) ] )

Notes:

This is a followup to my original report: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7233&eid=4681>

My original report was incorrect because I didn't notice the difference between "1*element" and "1#element". Thanks to Julian Reschke for pointing this out to me.

After looking up the "1#element" rule <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7230#section-7>, it looks like Section 2.1 and Appendix D are more similar, but not exactly equivalent.

The Appendix D version of the rule seems to allow extra commas and OWS.
I'm trying to write strict parsing code for this header and am not sure which definition to follow.

P.S. I hope I didn't screw up again. I apologize for wasting your time (again) if I did.
--VERIFIER NOTES--
See HTTPBIS mailing list discussion.

Report New Errata



Advanced Search