RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

RFC 6890, "Special-Purpose IP Address Registries", April 2013

Source of RFC: IETF - NON WORKING GROUP
Area Assignment: int

Errata ID: 3879
Status: Rejected
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Masataka MAWATARI
Date Reported: 2014-02-03
Rejected by: Ted Lemon
Date Rejected: 2014-03-18

Section 2.2.3 says:

                    +----------------------+----------------+
                    | Attribute            | Value          |
                    +----------------------+----------------+
                    | Address Block        | 2001::/32      |
                    | Name                 | TEREDO         |
                    | RFC                  | [RFC4380]      |
                    | Allocation Date      | January 2006   |
                    | Termination Date     | N/A            |
                    | Source               | True           |
                    | Destination          | True           |
                    | Forwardable          | True           |
                    | Global               | False          |
                    | Reserved-by-Protocol | False          |
                    +----------------------+----------------+

                             Table 23: TEREDO

                     +----------------------+--------------+
                     | Attribute            | Value        |
                     +----------------------+--------------+
                     | Address Block        | fc00::/7     |
                     | Name                 | Unique-Local |
                     | RFC                  | [RFC4193]    |
                     | Allocation Date      | October 2005 |
                     | Termination Date     | N/A          |
                     | Source               | True         |
                     | Destination          | True         |
                     | Forwardable          | True         |
                     | Global               | False        |
                     | Reserved-by-Protocol | False        |
                     +----------------------+--------------+

                          Table 28: Unique-Local

It should say:

                    +----------------------+----------------+
                    | Attribute            | Value          |
                    +----------------------+----------------+
                    | Address Block        | 2001::/32      |
                    | Name                 | TEREDO         |
                    | RFC                  | [RFC4380]      |
                    | Allocation Date      | January 2006   |
                    | Termination Date     | N/A            |
                    | Source               | True           |
                    | Destination          | True           |
                    | Forwardable          | True           |
                    | Global               | N/A [RFC4380]  |
                    | Reserved-by-Protocol | False          |
                    +----------------------+----------------+

                             Table 23: TEREDO

                    +----------------------+----------------+
                    | Attribute            | Value          |
                    +----------------------+----------------+
                    | Address Block        | fc00::/7       |
                    | Name                 | Unique-Local   |
                    | RFC                  | [RFC4193]      |
                    | Allocation Date      | October 2005   |
                    | Termination Date     | N/A            |
                    | Source               | True           |
                    | Destination          | True           |
                    | Forwardable          | True           |
                    | Global               | N/A [RFC4193]  |
                    | Reserved-by-Protocol | False          |
                    +----------------------+----------------+

                          Table 28: Unique-Local

Notes:

The global scope of TEREDO prefix (2001::/32) and Unique-Local prefix (fc00::/7) is not false.
The proposed revision is N/A with reference to each RFC.
--VERIFIER NOTES--
After discussion, we concluded that the ULA prefix change is not appropriate; a second erratum containing just the Teredo change has been submitted, so this one is not needed.

Report New Errata



Advanced Search