RFC 6735, "Diameter Priority Attribute-Value Pairs", October 2012Source of RFC: dime (ops)
Errata ID: 3859
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Hyungho Kim
Date Reported: 2014-01-02
Rejected by: Benoit Claise
Date Rejected: 2014-03-18
Section 5.1 says:
ALRP-Value 617 3.4.2 Unsigned32
It should say:
ALRP-Value 617 3.4.2 Unsigned8
Conflicts with section 3.4.2, which says "The ALRP-Value AVP (AVP Code 617) is of type Unsigned8"
In accordance with the DIME chairs: The introduction of new data types would imply a new version of the Base protocol..
"In the event that a new Basic AVP Data Format is needed,
a new version of this RFC MUST be created."
A bis document is required.