RFC 5521, "Extensions to the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) for Route Exclusions", April 2009Source of RFC: pce (rtg)
Errata ID: 3750
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Dana Kutenicsova
Date Reported: 2013-10-15
Verifier Name: Stewart Bryant
Date Verified: 2013-10-23
Section 3.1.1 says:
The format and definition of PKS when it appears as an XRO subobject are as defined in [RFC5520], except for the definition of the L bit. The L bit of the PKS subobject in the XRO MUST be ignored.
It should say:
The format and definition of PKS when it appears as an XRO subobject are as defined in [RFC5520], except that the L bit described in [RFC5220] is replaced with the X bit as discussed in Section 2.1.1 of this document.
The original text did not describe the value of the X bit in