RFC 5521, "Extensions to the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) for Route Exclusions", April 2009

Errata ID: 3750
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Dana Kutenicsova
Date Reported: 2013-10-15
Verifier Name: Stewart Bryant
Date Verified: 2013-10-23

Section 3.1.1 says:

The format and definition of PKS when it appears as an XRO subobject
are as defined in [RFC5520], except for the definition of the L bit.
The L bit of the PKS subobject in the XRO MUST be ignored.

It should say:

The format and definition of PKS when it appears as an XRO subobject
are as defined in [RFC5520], except that the L bit described in 
[RFC5220] is replaced with the X bit as discussed in Section 2.1.1 
of this document.

Notes:

The original text did not describe the value of the X bit in
PKS subobjects.

Report New Errata