RFC Errata
RFC 4364, "BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)", February 2006
Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 4577, RFC 4684, RFC 5462
Source of RFC: l3vpn (int)See Also: RFC 4364 w/ inline errata
Errata ID: 3649
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Bharat Joshi
Date Reported: 2013-06-12
Verifier Name: Brian Haberman
Date Verified: 2013-06-13
Section 4.3.2 says:
Then if a route is potentially reachable over more than one attachment circuit, the PE/CE routing can switch the preferred path for a route from one attachment circuit to another, without there being any need to distribute new a label for that route.
It should say:
Then if a route is potentially reachable over more than one attachment circuit, the PE/CE routing can switch the preferred path for a route from one attachment circuit to another, without there being any need to distribute a new label for that route.
Notes:
'distribute new a label' should be 'distribute a new label'.