RFC Errata

Errata Search

Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

RFC 5036, "LDP Specification", October 2007

Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 6720, RFC 6790, RFC 7358, RFC 7552

Source of RFC: mpls (rtg)

Errata ID: 3416
Status: Rejected
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Jeff Wheeler
Date Reported: 2012-11-26
Rejected by: Adrian Farrel
Date Rejected: 2012-11-26

Section 3.1 says:

For a platform-wide label space, these SHOULD both be zero.

It should say:

For a platform-wide label space, these MUST both be zero.


See Section 2.2.2 text, "The last two octets of LDP Identifiers for platform-wide label spaces are always both zero."
The text in 2.2.2 is descriptive of the LDP identifiers, but not a requirement. The text in 3.1 describes how the LDP identifier is constructed.

The purpose of the "SHOULD" is to direct normal behavior, but not to absolutely require the use of zero in these two octets if a good reason can be found.

Furthermore, there is nothing that would actually prohibit the use of non-zero values. The identifier of a label space is a local matter and another node, seeing a label space identifier, should not make any assumptions about the label space (e.g., it being a global label space or not), nor should it really matter.

Report New Errata

Advanced Search