RFC Errata
RFC 6044, "Mapping and Interworking of Diversion Information between Diversion and History-Info Headers in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)", October 2010
Note: This RFC has been obsoleted by RFC 7544
Source of RFC: INDEPENDENTSee Also: RFC 6044 w/ inline errata
Errata ID: 3176
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Brett Tate
Date Reported: 2012-04-04
Verifier Name: Nevil Brownlee
Date Verified: 2012-04-11
Section 3.2 says:
Diversion: diverting_user2_addr; reason="user-busy"; counter=1; privacy=full, diverting_user1_addr; reason="unconditional"; counter=1; privacy=off
It should say:
Diversion: <sip:diverting_user2_address>; reason=user-busy; counter=1; privacy=full, <sip:diverting_user1_address>; reason=unconditional; counter=1; privacy=off
Notes:
Errata 2603 already reported that the example did not correctly contain name-addr values. This is to report that the selected reason values should not be within quotes since these values have been explicitly defined to be non quoted. More specifically, the quotes within the example add confusion since RFC 5806 examples had similar quoting issues for values defined without quotes.