RFC Errata
RFC 5102, "Information Model for IP Flow Information Export", January 2008
Note: This RFC has been obsoleted by RFC 7012
Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 6313
Source of RFC: ipfix (ops)See Also: RFC 5102 w/ inline errata
Errata ID: 2946
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Paul Aitken
Date Reported: 2011-08-22
Verifier Name: Dan Romascanu
Date Verified: 2011-08-22
Section 5.8.8 says:
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+ | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ... +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+ 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+ ... | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |... +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+ 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+ ... | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |... +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+ . . . 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+ ... | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
It should say:
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+ | 63 | 62 | 61 | 60 | 59 | 58 | 57 | 56 | ... +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+ 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+ ... | 55 | 54 | 53 | 52 | 51 | 50 | 49 | 48 |... +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+ 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+ ... | 47 | 46 | 45 | 44 | 43 | 42 | 41 | 40 |... +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+ . . . 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+ ... | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
Notes:
The bits were originally shown in the wrong order.
Errata 1739 tried to correct this by reversing the bits, but overlooked reversing the bytes.