RFC 3445, "Limiting the Scope of the KEY Resource Record (RR)", December 2002Source of RFC: dnsext (int)
See Also: RFC 3445 w/ inline errata
Errata ID: 272
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: "Scott Rose"
Date Reported: 2005-02-22
Verifier Name: Brian Haberman
Date Verified: 2012-05-01
Values for the key protocol octet are incorrect. They should be:
VALUE Protocol 0 -reserved 1 reserved (was TLS) 2 reserved (was email) 3 dnssec 4 reserved (was IPSEC) 5-255 reserved
Rationale: Looking at RFC2535, the values are the original assignments. The
numbers in RFC3445 are incorrect and don't match. I guess since the
registry was closed, they are all reserved now and no one double checked.
RFC 2535 has the original correct assignments, and the registry is correct
in stating that they are now all reserved.