RFC Errata
RFC 4363, "Definitions of Managed Objects for Bridges with Traffic Classes, Multicast Filtering, and Virtual LAN Extensions", January 2006
Source of RFC: bridge (ops)
Errata ID: 2680
Status: Rejected
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: *Zhong* Qiyao
Date Reported: 2011-01-04
Rejected by: Ron Bonica
Date Rejected: 2011-01-24
Section MIB says:
> Dear IETF Person-in-Charge, > > We found that Q-BRIDGE-MIB (RFC 2674) had its content corrected > using the RFC 4363. > > While this kind of update and grammatical correction is a good > thing, > we found that: > > << old ("which" as correlative pronoun) > "The number of valid frames received by this port from > its segment which were classified as belonging to this > VLAN which were discarded due to VLAN related reasons. > Specifically, the IEEE 802.1Q counters for Discard > Inbound and Discard on Ingress Filtering." > >> > > << new ("that" as correlative pronoun) > "The number of valid frames received by this port from > its segment that were classified as belonging to this > VLAN and that were discarded due to VLAN-related reasons. > Specifically, the IEEE 802.1Q counters for Discard > Inbound and Discard on Ingress Filtering." > >> > > According to our education, "which" is correct, and "that" is > only > colloquial. But Microsoft Word seems to reject the use of "which" in > such > situations, and it may have mis-lead IETF into thinking that the Q- > BRIDGE-MIB > should remove "which" and use "that", which is a pity. > > Thanks. > > Qiyao #3165 鍾啟堯 上 > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > *Zhong* Qiyao, Xinzhu, Tajvano ~{VSFtR"~} > Greg 2009.12.13-19 > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes:
Many places.
--VERIFIER NOTES--
Please see http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/CMS_FAQ/Whichvs.That/Whichvs.That01.html for details
Ron Bonica