RFC 5810, "Forwarding and Control Element Separation (ForCES) Protocol Specification", March 2010Source of RFC: forces (rtg)
Errata ID: 2575
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Jamal Hadi Salim
Date Reported: 2010-10-16
Verifier Name: Adrian Farrel
Date Verified: 2011-05-08
Throughout the document:
There is some confusion in the way we describe the HA bits.
It should say:
Suggestions made by Evangelos Haleplidis for global consitency. i. For consistency of terms: Change word "stage" of page 17 to "phase". ii. Change the start of section 220.127.116.11 from: "In this stage..." To: "Entering this stage..." iii. Change the text in section 8 from: "Figure 44 extends the state machine illustrated in Figure 4 to allow for new states that facilitate connection recovery." To: "Figure 44 changes the state machine illustrated in Figure 4 to specify states that facilitate connection recovery." Also add the following text right after that: "In this figure, the pre-association phase and the Association Setup Stage are merged in one state and Association Lost stage is included in the Not Associated state." iv. Alter wording in Figure 44 in Page 84. Where it says: "CE issues Association Setup" Change to: "CE issues Association Setup Response"
Changes i through iii are entirely editorial and helf clarity in reading.
Change iv fixes a message name that might be confusing.