RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

RFC 5651, "Layered Coding Transport (LCT) Building Block", October 2009

Source of RFC: rmt (tsv)

Errata ID: 2000
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2010-01-10
Held for Document Update by: Magnus Westerlund

Section 6.1, pg. 25 says:

[ second-to-last paragraph, mid-page 25 : ]

   For the reasons mentioned above, this document does not pose any
   restriction on packet sizes.  However, network efficiency
   considerations recommend that the sender uses an as large as possible
   packet payload size, but in such a way that packets do not exceed the
|  network's maximum transmission unit size (MTU), or when fragmentation
   coupled with packet loss might introduce severe inefficiency in the
   transmission.

It should say:

   For the reasons mentioned above, this document does not pose any
   restriction on packet sizes.  However, network efficiency
   considerations recommend that the sender uses an as large as possible
   packet payload size, but in such a way that packets do not exceed the
|  network's maximum transmission unit size (MTU), because fragmentation
   coupled with packet loss might introduce severe inefficiency in the
   transmission.

Notes:

Rationale: "or when" does not make proper sense here; "because" does.

Report New Errata



Advanced Search