RFC Errata

Errata Search

Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

RFC 5491, "GEOPRIV Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO) Usage Clarification, Considerations, and Recommendations", March 2009

Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 7459

Source of RFC: geopriv (rai)
See Also: RFC 5491 w/ inline errata

Errata ID: 1951
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Martin Thomson
Date Reported: 2009-11-30
Verifier Name: Cullen Jennings
Date Verified: 2009-11-30

Section 5.2.2 says:

                     <gml:pos>43.311 -73.422</gml:pos> <!--A-->
                     <gml:pos>43.111 -73.322</gml:pos> <!--F-->
                     <gml:pos>43.111 -73.222</gml:pos> <!--E-->
                     <gml:pos>43.311 -73.122</gml:pos> <!--D-->
                     <gml:pos>43.411 -73.222</gml:pos> <!--C-->
                     <gml:pos>43.411 -73.322</gml:pos> <!--B-->
                     <gml:pos>43.311 -73.422</gml:pos> <!--A-->

It should say:

                     <gml:pos>43.311 -73.422</gml:pos> <!--A-->
                     <gml:pos>43.111 -73.322</gml:pos> <!--B-->
                     <gml:pos>43.111 -73.222</gml:pos> <!--C-->
                     <gml:pos>43.311 -73.122</gml:pos> <!--D-->
                     <gml:pos>43.411 -73.222</gml:pos> <!--E-->
                     <gml:pos>43.411 -73.322</gml:pos> <!--F-->
                     <gml:pos>43.311 -73.422</gml:pos> <!--A-->


The points in Figure 7 are correct (i.e., they are in a counter-clockwise direction) but the comment labels are in the wrong order.

Report New Errata

Advanced Search