RFC Errata
RFC 959, "File Transfer Protocol", October 1985
Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 2228, RFC 2640, RFC 2773, RFC 3659, RFC 5797, RFC 7151
Source of RFC: LegacyArea Assignment: app
Errata ID: 1941
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Tomasz Kluza
Date Reported: 2009-11-09
Held for Document Update by: Peter Saint-Andre
Section 3.1.1.5. says:
(...)Therefore, these types have a second parameter specifying one of the following three formats: 3.1.1.5.1. NON PRINT (...) 3.1.1.5.2. TELNET FORMAT CONTROLS (...) 3.1.1.5.2. CARRIAGE CONTROL (ASA)
It should say:
(...)Therefore, these types have a second parameter specifying one of the following three formats: 3.1.1.5.1. NON PRINT (...) 3.1.1.5.2. TELNET FORMAT CONTROLS (...) 3.1.1.5.3. CARRIAGE CONTROL (ASA)
Notes:
Two Sections in the RFC have the same number in the document whereas the The Carriage Control (ASA) should have 3.1.1.5.3. in the structure of the RFC document since its a third format of the possible value for the parameter mention in the statement "Therefore, these types have a second parameter specifying one of the following three formats" ATM it has the same 3.1.1.5.2. as the Telnet Format Controls.