RFC 4873, "GMPLS Segment Recovery", May 2007
Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 9270Source of RFC: ccamp (rtg)
See Also: RFC 4873 w/ inline errata
Errata ID: 1797
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: David McWalter
Date Reported: 2009-06-23
Verifier Name: Adrian Farrel
Date Verified: 2010-08-20
Section 5.2 says:
The collection of SRROs is controlled via the segment-recording-desired flag in the SESSION_ATTRIBUTE object. This flag MAY be set even when SEROs are not used.
It should say:
The collection of SRROs is controlled via the presence of an RRO in the message being processed.
No request was made to IANA to assign a value for the segment-recording-desired flag.
As reported in the Errata, the segment-recording-desired flag is
unassigned. The flag is unassigned and therefore cannot be used.
As agreed to on the CCAMP mail list and the Stockholm (IETF 75)
working group meeting the the collection of SRROs should be
controlled based on the presence of an RRO in the message being
processed. That is, the segment-recording-desired flag should be
considered to be set when an RRO is present in the message being