RFC Errata
RFC 5384, "The Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM) Join Attribute Format", November 2008
Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 7887
Source of RFC: pim (rtg)
Errata ID: 1598
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2008-11-17
Held for Document Update by: Adrian Farrel
Date Held: 2013-01-16
Section 3.4.2 says:
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | OptionType = 26 | OptionLength = 0 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
It should say:
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | OptionType = 26 | OptionLength = 0 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Notes:
The notes when raised read:
> Misplaced field separator (vertical bar).
>
> Erratum is considered 'Technical' because the text of the RFC
> does not contain text that could guide the reader in
> disambiguating the figure.
Moving this to editorial with the note that PIM Option formats are well known.