RFC 5384, "The Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM) Join Attribute Format", November 2008

Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 7887

Errata ID: 1598
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2008-11-17
Held for Document Update by: Adrian Farrel
Date Held: 2013-01-16

Section 3.4.2 says:

    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|  |      OptionType = 26           |      OptionLength = 0        |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

It should say:

    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|  |      OptionType = 26          |       OptionLength = 0        |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Notes:

The notes when raised read:

> Misplaced field separator (vertical bar).
>
> Erratum is considered 'Technical' because the text of the RFC
> does not contain text that could guide the reader in
> disambiguating the figure.

Moving this to editorial with the note that PIM Option formats are well known.

Report New Errata