RFC Errata
RFC 3410, "Introduction and Applicability Statements for Internet-Standard Management Framework", December 2002
Source of RFC: snmpv3 (ops)
Errata ID: 1560
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Carl Marcinik
Date Reported: 2008-10-11
Held for Document Update by: Dan Romascanu
Section 8.2 says:
Of course, it is important that users deploying multi-lingual systems with insecure protocols exercise sufficient due diligence to insure that configurations limit access via SNMPv1 and SNMPv2c appropriately, in keeping with the organization’s security policy, just as they should carefully limit access granted via SNMPv3 with a security level of no authentication and no privacy which is roughly equivalent from a security point of view.
It should say:
Of course, it is important that users deploying multi-lingual systems with insecure protocols exercise sufficient due diligence to ensure that configurations limit access via SNMPv1 and SNMPv2c appropriately, in keeping with the organization’s security policy, just as they should carefully limit access granted via SNMPv3 with a security level of no authentication and no privacy which is roughly equivalent from a security point of view.
Notes:
The sentence used "insure" when it should have used "ensure".