RFC 5302, "Domain-Wide Prefix Distribution with Two-Level IS-IS", October 2008

Errata ID: 1542
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2008-10-08
Held for Document Update by: Stewart Bryant

Section 5, 2nd para says:

                                              [...].  In this case, the
   solution defined in this document, which requires only an upgrade of
   L1L2 routers in selected areas, might be a good alternative to the
|  solution defined in 5305.

It should say:

                                              [...].  In this case, the
   solution defined in this document, which requires only an upgrade of
   L1L2 routers in selected areas, might be a good alternative to the
|  solution defined in RFC 5305.
                       ^^^^

Notes:

Rationale: inconsistent, too colloquial verbiage.

Report New Errata