RFC 5295, "Specification for the Derivation of Root Keys from an Extended Master Session Key (EMSK)", August 2008

Errata ID: 1499
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2008-09-02
Held for Document Update by: Tim Polk
Date Held: 2010-03-22

Section 8, pg.16 says:

   The keywords "Private Use", "Specification Required", and "IETF
|  Consensus" that appear in this document when used to describe
   ^^^^^^^^^
   namespace allocation are to be interpreted as described in [RFC5226].

It should say:

   The keywords "Private Use", "Specification Required", and "IETF
|  Review" that appear in this document when used to describe namespace
   ^^^^^^
   allocation are to be interpreted as described in [RFC5226].

Notes:

RFC 5226 has purposely changed the terminology.
Updating the Ref. to RFC 5226 hence should have been accompanied by
upgrading the terminology.

This same issue recurs in the third line of Section 8.2 of RFC 5295.

Report New Errata