RFC 4996, "RObust Header Compression (ROHC): A Profile for TCP/IP (ROHC-TCP)", July 2007

Note: This RFC has been obsoleted by RFC 6846

Errata ID: 1297
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2008-01-21
Held for Document Update by: Magnus Westerlund
Date Held: 2009-09-07

Section 7.2, p.39 says:

|  The ROHC-TCP IR-CR packet follows the general format of the ROHC CR
   packet, as defined in [RFC4164], Section 3.5.2.  [...]
   

It should say:

   The ROHC-TCP IR-CR packet follows the general format of the ROHC
|  IR-CR packet, as defined in [RFC4164], Section 3.5.2.  [...]
 

Notes:

RFC 4996 should use precise terminology established in RFC 4995
and RFC 4164.
"CR" does not appear anywhere in both RFCs (and it does not recur in
RFC 4996 as well); "IR-CR" should be used for clarity and precision.

Chair reply: It should be IR-CR and there is no CR defined in the document, but I think most people will understand the sentence. Still, if/when we update this document we should make this correction. So hold for update.

Report New Errata