RFC Errata
RFC 5087, "Time Division Multiplexing over IP (TDMoIP)", December 2007
Source of RFC: pwe3 (int)
Errata ID: 1213
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2008-01-03
Held for Document Update by: Stewart Bryant
Date Held: 2011-08-04
Section 4.4, 3rd p. says:
Ethernet encapsulation introduces restrictions on both minimum and maximum packet size. Whenever the entire TDMoIP packet is less than 64 bytes, padding is introduced and the true length indicated by using the Length field in the control word. In order to avoid fragmentation, the TDMoIP packet MUST be restricted to the maximum payload size. For example, the length of the Ethernet payload for a UDP/IP encapsulation of AAL1 format payload with 30 PDUs per packet is 1472 bytes, which falls below the maximal permitted payload size of 1500 bytes.
It should say:
Ethernet encapsulation introduces restrictions on both minimum and maximum packet size. Whenever the entire TDMoIP packet is less than 64 bytes, padding is introduced and the true length indicated by using the Length field in the control word. In order to avoid fragmentation, the TDMoIP packet MUST be restricted to the maximum payload size. For example, the length of the Ethernet payload for a | UDP/IP encapsulation of the AAL1 format payload with 30 PDUs per packet is 1472 bytes, which falls below the maximal permitted payload size of 1500 bytes.