RFC Errata
RFC 4343, "Domain Name System (DNS) Case Insensitivity Clarification", January 2006
Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 5890
Source of RFC: dnsext (int)
Errata ID: 119
Status: Rejected
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Bruce Lilly
Date Reported: 2006-02-26
Rejected by: Brian Haberman
Date Rejected: 2012-04-30
Section 1 says:
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
It should say:
The key words "MUST" and "MAY" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
Notes:
Other than in the above-quoted sentence, there are no
instances of "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", SHOULD",
"SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", or "OPTIONAL" in the RFC (and the
instances above surely cannot be interpreted as described in RFC
2119; they are mere labels in the context of that sentence).
--VERIFIER NOTES--
The keyword paragraph is standard, and although words are mentioned that are later not used, this is not an error.