RFC Errata
RFC 4352, "RTP Payload Format for the Extended Adaptive Multi-Rate Wideband (AMR-WB+) Audio Codec", January 2006
Source of RFC: avt (rai)See Also: RFC 4352 w/ inline errata
Errata ID: 114
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2006-02-07
(1) In Section 4.3.2.3 of RFC 4352, the first formula line on page 18, TS(i) = TS(i-1) + (DISi + 1) * frame duration, 2 < i < n should say: TS(i) = TS(i-1) + (DISi + 1) * frame duration, 2 <= i <= n (2) The 'Example Algorithm' in Section 4.5.1, on page 27, in the second half of Step 1, says: Return recovered timestamps as x(n) = t0 + n*L1 and associated ISF equal to isf0, for 0 < n < (t1 - t0)/L0 goto End This pseudocode fragment should say: for 0 < n < (t1 - t0)/L0 Return recovered timestamps as x(n) = t0 + n*L0 and associated ISF equal to isf0 goto End (3) In Section 7.2, on page 32, the second item of the unnumbered list says: - The media type (payload format name) is used in SDP "a=rtpmap" as the encoding name. [...] It should say: - The media subtype (payload format name) is used in SDP "a=rtpmap" as the encoding name. [...] (4) Within the second paragraph on page 33, Section 7.2.1 of RFC 4352 says: [...] As any receiver will be capable of receiving stereo frame type and perform local mixing within the AMR-WB+ decoder, there is normally only one reason to restrict to mono only: to avoid spending bit-rate on data that are not utilized if the front-end is only capable of mono. It should say: [...] As any receiver will be capable of receiving stereo frame types and perform local mixing within the AMR-WB+ decoder, there is normally only one reason to restrict to mono only: to avoid spending bit-rate on data that are not utilized if the front-end is only capable of mono.
Notes:
from pending