RFC 7988

Ingress Replication Tunnels in Multicast VPN, October 2016

File formats:
icon for text file icon for PDF icon for HTML
Status:
PROPOSED STANDARD
Updates:
RFC 6513, RFC 6514
Authors:
E. Rosen, Ed.
K. Subramanian
Z. Zhang
Stream:
IETF
Source:
bess (rtg)

Cite this RFC: TXT  |  XML  |   BibTeX

DOI:  https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC7988

Discuss this RFC: Send questions or comments to the mailing list bess@ietf.org

Other actions: Submit Errata  |  Find IPR Disclosures from the IETF  |  View History of RFC 7988


Abstract

RFCs 6513, 6514, and other RFCs describe procedures by which a Service Provider may offer Multicast VPN (MVPN) service to its customers. These procedures create point-to-multipoint (P2MP) or multipoint-to-multipoint (MP2MP) trees across the Service Provider's backbone. One type of P2MP tree that may be used is known as an "Ingress Replication (IR) tunnel". In an IR tunnel, a parent node need not be directly connected to its child nodes. When a parent node has to send a multicast data packet to its n child nodes, it does not use Layer 2 multicast, IP multicast, or MPLS multicast to do so. Rather, it makes n individual copies, and then unicasts each copy, through an IP or MPLS unicast tunnel, to exactly one child node. While the prior MVPN specifications allow the use of IR tunnels, those specifications are not always very clear or explicit about how the MVPN protocol elements and procedures are applied to IR tunnels. This document updates RFCs 6513 and 6514 by adding additional details that are specific to the use of IR tunnels.


For the definition of Status, see RFC 2026.

For the definition of Stream, see RFC 8729.




Advanced Search