RFC 7079

The Pseudowire (PW) and Virtual Circuit Connectivity Verification (VCCV) Implementation Survey Results, November 2013

File formats:
icon for text file icon for PDF icon for HTML
Status:
INFORMATIONAL
Authors:
N. Del Regno, Ed.
A. Malis, Ed.
Stream:
IETF
Source:
pwe3 (rtg)

Cite this RFC: TXT  |  XML  |   BibTeX

DOI:  https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC7079

Discuss this RFC: Send questions or comments to the mailing list pals@ietf.org

Other actions: Submit Errata  |  Find IPR Disclosures from the IETF  |  View History of RFC 7079


Abstract

The IETF Pseudowire Emulation Edge-to-Edge (PWE3) working group has defined many encapsulations of various layer 1 and layer 2 service- specific PDUs and circuit data. In most of these encapsulations, use of the Pseudowire (PW) Control Word is required. However, there are several encapsulations for which the Control Word is optional, and this optionality has been seen in practice to possibly introduce interoperability concerns between multiple implementations of those encapsulations. This survey of the Pseudowire / Virtual Circuit Connectivity Verification (VCCV) user community was conducted to determine implementation trends and the possibility of always mandating the Control Word.


For the definition of Status, see RFC 2026.

For the definition of Stream, see RFC 8729.




Advanced Search