RFC 4095
Attaching Meaning to Solicitation Class Keywords, May 2005
- File formats:
- Status:
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Author:
- C. Malamud
- Stream:
- IETF
- Source:
- NON WORKING GROUP
Cite this RFC: TXT | XML | BibTeX
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC4095
Discuss this RFC: Send questions or comments to the mailing list iesg@ietf.org
Other actions: Submit Errata | Find IPR Disclosures from the IETF | View History of RFC 4095
Abstract
This document proposes a mechanism for finding a URI associated with a solicitation class keyword, which is defined in RFC 3865, the No Soliciting SMTP Service Extension. Solicitation class keywords are simple labels consisting of a domain name that has been reversed, such as "org.example.adv". These solicitation class keywords are inserted in selected header fields or used in the ESMTP service extension, including a new \%"No-Solicit:" header, which can contain one or more solicitation class keywords inserted by the sender.
This document specifies an application based on the Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS) described in RFC 3401 and related documents. An algorithm is specified to associate a solicitation class keyword with a URI which contains further information about the meaning and usage of that solicitation class keyword. For example, the registrant of the "example.org" domain could use this mechanism to create a URI which contains detailed information about the "org.example.adv" solicitation class keyword. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
For the definition of Status, see RFC 2026.
For the definition of Stream, see RFC 8729.