RFC 3675

.sex Considered Dangerous, February 2004

File formats:
icon for text file icon for PDF icon for HTML
Status:
INFORMATIONAL
Author:
D. Eastlake 3rd
Stream:
INDEPENDENT

Cite this RFC: TXT  |  XML  |   BibTeX

DOI:  https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC3675

Discuss this RFC: Send questions or comments to the mailing list rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org

Other actions: Submit Errata  |  Find IPR Disclosures from the IETF  |  View History of RFC 3675


Abstract

Periodically there are proposals to mandate the use of a special top level name or an IP address bit to flag "adult" or "unsafe" material or the like. This document explains why this is an ill considered idea from the legal, philosophical, and particularly, the technical points of view.


For the definition of Status, see RFC 2026.

For the definition of Stream, see RFC 8729.




Advanced Search